United States v. James E. Matthews and Stanley Ward

460 F.2d 275, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9473
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1972
Docket71-3360
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 275 (United States v. James E. Matthews and Stanley Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James E. Matthews and Stanley Ward, 460 F.2d 275, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9473 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants were convicted after jury trial of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 1792 in that they conveyed from place to place within the United States penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, an explosive device designed to kill, injure or disable officers, agents, employees and inmates of such institution. We affirm.

*276 There is no merit in the assignments of error having to do with the failure to continue the trial and in the number of jury strikes allowed appellants in selecting the jurors and the alternate juror. The assignment of error arising from the use of a film showing a test of an explosive device substantially similar to the device in issue is also without merit. The weight of this evidence was for the jury under a proper cautionary instruction which was given. The contention that there was no proof that the penitentiary in question was a federal penal and correctional institution is unsupported.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Stanley Ward
610 F.2d 294 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Stanley S. X. Ward v. United States
486 F.2d 305 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 275, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-e-matthews-and-stanley-ward-ca5-1972.