United States v. James E. Cole
This text of 914 F.2d 298 (United States v. James E. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
286 U.S.App.D.C. 242
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
James E. COLE, Appellant.
No. 89-3121.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 27, 1990.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, and BUCKLEY and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This case was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant's conviction be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its March 29, 1989 memorandum on appellant's motion to suppress.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
914 F.2d 298, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25037, 1990 WL 140579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-e-cole-cadc-1990.