United States v. James David Williams and Maria Gunzalas

282 F.2d 899
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 11, 1960
Docket26129_1
StatusPublished

This text of 282 F.2d 899 (United States v. James David Williams and Maria Gunzalas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James David Williams and Maria Gunzalas, 282 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1960).

Opinion

282 F.2d 899

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
James David WILLIAMS and Maria Gunzalas, Appellants.

No. 101, Docket 26129.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 11, 1960.
Decided Oct. 11, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Alexander Bicks, Judge.

Harold L. Wood, Mount Vernon, N.Y., for appellants.

George I. Gordon, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U.S. Atty., and Herbert F. Roth, and David R. Hyde, Asst. U.S. Attys., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, CLARK and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed in open court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 F.2d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-david-williams-and-maria-gun-ca2-1960.