United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II

460 F.2d 320, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10192
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 10, 1972·No. 71-2778·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this prosecution for refusing induction [50 U.S.C. App. § 462], appellant relies primarily on his claim that there was no basis in fact for the local board’s classifying him I-A in the face of evidence of medical disability. The medical evidence did not clearly present a prima facie case for exemption; but if it did, the finding of acceptability by the examining center provides a basis for the classification in this case.

The trial court properly refused to redetermine appellant’s other claims. United States v. Shunk, 438 F.2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Brunges, 450 F.2d 947 (9th Cir. 1971); and Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II, 460 F.2d 320, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10192 (9th Cir. 1972).

460 F.2d 320 (United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Louis Felipe Cantero
471 F.2d 1190 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)