United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II

460 F.2d 320, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10192
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1972
Docket71-2778
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 320 (United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II, 460 F.2d 320, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10192 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this prosecution for refusing induction [50 U.S.C. App. § 462], appellant relies primarily on his claim that there was no basis in fact for the local board’s classifying him I-A in the face of evidence of medical disability. The medical evidence did not clearly present a prima facie case for exemption; but if it did, the finding of acceptability by the examining center provides a basis for the classification in this case.

The trial court properly refused to redetermine appellant’s other claims. United States v. Shunk, 438 F.2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Brunges, 450 F.2d 947 (9th Cir. 1971); and Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Louis Felipe Cantero
471 F.2d 1190 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 320, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-chalmers-clemence-ii-ca9-1972.