United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II
This text of 460 F.2d 320 (United States v. James Chalmers Clemence, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this prosecution for refusing induction [50 U.S.C. App. § 462], appellant relies primarily on his claim that there was no basis in fact for the local board’s classifying him I-A in the face of evidence of medical disability. The medical evidence did not clearly present a prima facie case for exemption; but if it did, the finding of acceptability by the examining center provides a basis for the classification in this case.
The trial court properly refused to redetermine appellant’s other claims. United States v. Shunk, 438 F.2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Brunges, 450 F.2d 947 (9th Cir. 1971); and Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
460 F.2d 320, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-chalmers-clemence-ii-ca9-1972.