United States v. James Carpenter
This text of 852 F.2d 569 (United States v. James Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 87-2177.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 24, 1988.
Before KEITH and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Defendant moves the Court for an order remanding this matter to the district court for the limited purpose of considering his motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) for reduction of sentence. The defendant submitted certification by the district court that it is inclined to grant the motion. See United States v. Sanzo, 831 F.2d 671, 672 (6th Cir.1987); United States v. Ellsworth, 814 F.2d 613, 614 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam).
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the motion to remand is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
852 F.2d 569, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11167, 1988 WL 76104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-carpenter-ca6-1988.