United States v. James

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 F. App'x 437
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2002·No. 99-1762·Unknown

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS $ WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DD

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1R Y  !  (':$5' s$0(6  'HIHQGDQW$SSHOODQW  1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH(DVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI0LFKLJDQDW'HWURLW 1RnsXOLDQ$&RRNsU6HQLRU'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHG0DUFK 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG)HEUXDU\ %HIRUH6,/(50225(DQG&/$<&LUFXLWsXGJHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &2816(/ $5*8('  .HYLQ 0 6FKDG 6&+$'  &22. ,QGLDQ 6SULQJV2KLRIRU$SSHOODQWsRQDWKDQ7XNHO$66,67$17 81,7(' 67$7(6 $77251(< 'HWURLW 0LFKLJDQ IRU $SSHOOHH

  8QLWHG6WDWHVYsDPHV 1R

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB $0(1'('23,1,21 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6,/(5 &LUFXLW sXGJH  8SRQ PRWLRQ E\ WKH GHIHQGDQW (GZDUGsDPHVIRUDUHKHDULQJDQGJRRGFDXVHKDYLQJEHHQ VKRZQDQGXSRQWKHFRQFHVVLRQE\WKHJRYHUQPHQWWKDWDWWKH WLPH RI WKH HQWU\ RI WKH SOHD RI JXLOW\ E\ sDPHV WKDW WKH JRYHUQPHQWFRXOGQRWKDYHDGGXFHGDQ\DGGLWLRQDOSURRIRQ WKH LQWHUVWDWH FRPPHUFH HOHPHQW XQGHU WKH +REEV $FW  86& †  DV WR sDPHV WKDQ LW GLG DW WULDO DJDLQVW WKH FRGHIHQGDQWV6HOHQD7XUQHUDQG.HYLQ/DUNLQVRXURSLQLRQ RI 1RYHPEHU   LV DPHQGHG WR UHIOHFW WKDW WKH FRQYLFWLRQDQGVHQWHQFHRIsDPHVDUH5(9(56('

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. James, (6th Cir. 2002).

United States v. James (United States v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.