United States v. James

41 F. App'x 659
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. James. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 F. App'x 686
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2002·No. 02-6458·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Milton Keith James seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. James, Nos. CR-88-70-K; CA-01-1904-JFM (D. Md. filed July 16, 2001; Jan. 7, 2002 & entered Jan. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. James, 41 F. App'x 659 (4th Cir. 2002).

41 F. App'x 659 (United States v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related