United States v. James

106 F. App'x 752
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedAugust 24, 2004
DocketNo. 03-1660
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 106 F. App'x 752 (United States v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James, 106 F. App'x 752 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant Ronnie James, who pleaded guilty to charges of possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, appeals only with regard to the sentence imposed by the District Court. His sole claim on appeal is that he is entitled to a downward departure pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5K1.1, notwithstanding the absence of a Government motion for such a departure.

Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments of the parties, we conclude that, in the circumstances presented here, there was no error in the decision of the District Court to deny defendant’s application for a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 downward departure. A district court’s review of a Government’s decision to not file a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion is necessarily limited to questions of constitutionality and bad faith, see Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181, 112 S.Ct. 1840, 118 L.Ed.2d 524 (1992), neither of which is present in the instant case.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James
307 F. App'x 503 (Second Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 F. App'x 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-ca2-2004.