United States v. James Burel Jones

460 F.2d 325, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9481
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1972
Docket72-1112
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 325 (United States v. James Burel Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Burel Jones, 460 F.2d 325, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9481 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jones appeals from his conviction for possession of stolen mail. 18 U.S.C. § 1708. We affirm.

Neither of Jones’ claims has merit. The challenged remarks of the prosecutor, taken in context, were not such as to mislead the jury. Jones’ counsel did not object to them and made no request to the trial judge for a cautionary statement, if one were in fact warranted. While we are highly skeptical that there was any error, assuming that there were, it was surely harmless. Fed. R.Crim.P. 52(a).

Jones also attacks one of the instructions to the jury. His counsel was afforded an opportunity to object to the instructions at trial and did not do so. Hence review is foreclosed. Fed.R.Crim. P. 30.

Affirmed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 325, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-burel-jones-ca9-1972.