United States v. James Barrasso

Third Circuit

United States v. James Barrasso

372 F.2d 136, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7590

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 31, 1967·No. 15893·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a labor union official, has been convicted of illegally demanding money from an employer. Sentence was suspended, and a five year period of probation was imposed with the special condition that during probation he not seek or accept employment by any labor union.

We are satisfied that the evidence, though equivocal in some particulars, was sufficient to establish a case for the jury and that the sentence was proper under the controlling statutes. The other questions raised on this appeal have been considered and found to be without merit.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a labor union official, has been convicted of illegally demanding money from an employer. Sentence was suspended, and a five year period of probation was imposed with the special condition that during probation he not seek or accept employment by any labor union.

We are satisfied that the evidence, though equivocal in some particulars, was sufficient to establish a case for the jury and that the sentence was proper under the controlling statutes. The other questions raised on this appeal have been considered and found to be without merit.

The judgment will be affirmed.

United States v. James Barrasso, 372 F.2d 136, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7590 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

372 F.2d 136 (United States v. James Barrasso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related