United States v. James Barrasso

372 F.2d 136, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7590
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 1967
Docket15893
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 372 F.2d 136 (United States v. James Barrasso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Barrasso, 372 F.2d 136, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7590 (3d Cir. 1967).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a labor union official, has been convicted of illegally demanding money from an employer. Sentence was suspended, and a five year period of probation was imposed with the special condition that during probation he not seek or accept employment by any labor union.

We are satisfied that the evidence, though equivocal in some particulars, was sufficient to establish a case for the jury and that the sentence was proper under the controlling statutes. The other questions raised on this appeal have been considered and found to be without merit.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pashandi
490 So. 2d 679 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
United States v. Timothy Walter Stine
646 F.2d 839 (Third Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 F.2d 136, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-barrasso-ca3-1967.