United States v. James Allen De Clue, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

United States v. James Allen De Clue, Jr.

454 F.2d 1174

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 1972

Docket71-1648

StatusPublished

This text of 454 F.2d 1174 (United States v. James Allen De Clue, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. James Allen De Clue, Jr., 454 F.2d 1174 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

De Clue pleaded guilty to the offense of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He appeals from the judgment of conviction, contending (1) that the sentence imposed by the district judge was unduly harsh, (2) that the assistance rendered to him by his trial counsel was ineffective.

Neither of De Clue’s contentions has any merit whatsoever. Accordingly, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

De Clue pleaded guilty to the offense of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He appeals from the judgment of conviction, contending (1) that the sentence imposed by the district judge was unduly harsh, (2) that the assistance rendered to him by his trial counsel was ineffective.

Neither of De Clue’s contentions has any merit whatsoever. Accordingly, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

454 F.2d 1174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-allen-de-clue-jr-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack