United States v. James Alfred Hills

409 F.2d 827
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1969
Docket26433_1
StatusPublished

This text of 409 F.2d 827 (United States v. James Alfred Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. James Alfred Hills, 409 F.2d 827 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Alfred Hills was convicted of the offense of theft of parcel post packages from a United States Post Office in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1708. At Hills’ behest we have carefully examined the record of his trial. 1 We have found neither evidentiary nor procedural irregularity, and we have found that there is substantial evidence in the record to support his conviction.

Affirmed.

1

. Under Rule 18 the Court has placed this case on the Summary Calendar for disposition without oral argument. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 F.2d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-alfred-hills-ca5-1969.