United States v. James Alford Chatman

Ninth Circuit

United States v. James Alford Chatman

436 F.2d 1377

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 2, 1971·No. 26120_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The record manifests that the district court’s denial of Chatman’s mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion. 1

This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

1

. The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The record manifests that the district court’s denial of Chatman’s mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion. 1

This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

1

. The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.

United States v. James Alford Chatman, 436 F.2d 1377 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

436 F.2d 1377 (United States v. James Alford Chatman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.