United States v. James Alford Chatman

Ninth Circuit

United States v. James Alford Chatman

436 F.2d 1377

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1971

Docket26120_1

StatusPublished

This text of 436 F.2d 1377 (United States v. James Alford Chatman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. James Alford Chatman, 436 F.2d 1377 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The record manifests that the district court’s denial of Chatman’s mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion. 1

This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

1

. The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The record manifests that the district court’s denial of Chatman’s mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion. 1

This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

1

. The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 F.2d 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-james-alford-chatman-ca9-1971.