United States v. Jamel Law
This text of United States v. Jamel Law (United States v. Jamel Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7708
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMEL LAW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00477-CMH-2)
Submitted: March 23, 2021 Decided: March 29, 2021
Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamel C. Law, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jamel Law appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court
granted Law the largest reduction possible pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
§ 1B1.10 (2018). See also United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437-42 (4th Cir. 2016).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Law,
No. 1:10-CR-00477-CMH-2 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 22, 2020 & entered Oct. 27, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jamel Law, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jamel-law-ca4-2021.