United States v. Jamal Suliman Muhtaseb

112 F.3d 514, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 14224, 1997 WL 234684

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: May 9, 1997
• Docket: 97-1157
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

112 F.3d 514

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Jamal Suliman MUHTASEB, Appellant.

No. 97-1157.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 5, 1997.
Decided May 9, 1997.

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jamal Muhtaseb pleaded guilty to failing to surrender for service of his sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(2). At sentencing, the district court1 denied Muhtaseb's motion for a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.0 (1995), and sentenced Muhtaseb to 21 months imprisonment and three years supervised release. Muhtaseb appeals, arguing that the district court erred by denying the departure motion. We affirm.

A court may depart from the applicable Guidelines range "if the court finds 'that there exists an aggravating or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines that should result in a sentence different from that described.' " U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.0, p.s. (1995) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)). If a district court's refusal to depart was an exercise of discretion, we cannot review the ruling; if, however, the district court concluded it lacked the authority to depart, we may review the ruling. See United States v. Jenkins, 78 F.3d 1283, 1290 (8th Cir.1996); United States v. Bieri, 21 F.3d 811, 817 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 878 (1994). Upon our review of the record, we conclude the district court was clearly aware of its authority to depart. Thus, its refusal to do so was an unreviewable exercise of discretion.

Accordingly, we affirm.

1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota