United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes

318 F. App'x 197

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 18, 2009

DocketNo. 09-6087

StatusPublished

This text of 318 F. App'x 197 (United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, 318 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes appeals a district court order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no reversible error. We affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, No. 1:01-cr-00245-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes appeals a district court order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no reversible error. We affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, No. 1:01-cr-00245-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

318 F. App'x 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jaimes-jaimes-ca4-2009.