United States v. Jaime Miranda

388 F. App'x 697
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2010·No. 09-10271·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Zazueta Miranda appeals from the 168-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss based on the valid appeal waiver.

Miranda contends that the appeal waiver contained in his plea agreement is unenforceable. Our review of the agreement indicates that the waiver unambiguously encompasses Miranda’s challenge to his sentence. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1154 (9th Cir.2005). Miranda’s contention that the waiver was not knowing and voluntary because the plea colloquy was deficient is belied by the record. See id. at 1154-55.

We decline to consider on direct appeal Miranda’s challenge to the validity of his guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel. See 'id. at 1155-56.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jaime Miranda, 388 F. App'x 697 (9th Cir. 2010).

388 F. App'x 697 (United States v. Jaime Miranda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. United States
179 L. Ed. 2d 636 (Supreme Court, 2011)