United States v. Jacobo

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedAugust 12, 2022
Docket202200048
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Jacobo (United States v. Jacobo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jacobo, (N.M. 2022).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before MONAHAN, DEERWESTER, and BURGTORF Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Sergio JACOBO Electrician’s Mate Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 202200048

Decided: 12 August 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Ann K. Minami

Sentence adjudged 20 January 2022 by a general court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduc- tion to E-1, confinement for 42 months, 1 and a dishonorable discharge.

1 Appellant was credited with 129 days of confinement credit. The convening au- thority deferred all of the automatic forfeitures from 14 days from the date the sentence was adjudged until the date the entry of judgment was signed by the military judge. All of the automatic forfeitures were waived for a period of six months, with the waiver commencing on the date the entry of judgment was signed by the military judge. The waived forfeitures were directed to be paid to Appellant’s spouse. United States v. Jacobo, NMCCA No. 202200048 Opinion of the Court

For Appellant: Major Brian L. Farrell, USMCR

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

S. TAYLOR JOHNSTON Interim Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jacobo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jacobo-nmcca-2022.