United States v. Jacob Ness

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1310

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jacob Dylan Ness

Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________

Submitted: September 19, 2022 Filed: November 10, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

After Jacob Ness violated the conditions of probation by using methamphetamine, the district court1 varied upward and gave him a 27-month prison sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a). Although he argues that the sentence is too long, we affirm.

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

We conclude that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v.

Michael, 12 F.4th 858, 860 (8th Cir. 2021) (stating that a within-Guidelines sentence is presumed reasonable). The record establishes that the district court sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment, see United States v. Leonard, 785 F.3d 303, 306–07 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam). In its view, Ness presented a “clear danger to the community” based on his “outrageous criminal behavior,” even though he was “trying to remain sober.” Cf. Michael, 12 F.4th at 860–61 (affirming an upward departure based on the district court’s decision “to give greater weight to the risk to the public”). Just because Ness believes the court should have weighed these factors differently does not mean the court abused its discretion. See United States v. Holdsworth, 830 F.3d 779, 786 (8th Cir. 2016).

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________