United States v. Jacob
84 F. App'x 781
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 10, 2003·No. No. 03-30208; D.C. No. CR-98-00076-1-HA·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alander L. Jacob appeals the district court’s denial of his motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have jurisdiction over this final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm the district court’s order.
Because Mr. Jacob’s claim was not the proper subject of a Rule 36 motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to resentence Mr-. Jacob. See United States v. Penna, 319 F.3d 509, 513 (9th Cir.2003); United States v. Kaye, 739 F.2d 488, 490 (9th Cir.1984).
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jacob, 84 F. App'x 781 (9th Cir. 2003).
84 F. App'x 781 (United States v. Jacob) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Robert Kaye, Movant-Appellant
739 F.2d 488 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Todd Penna
319 F.3d 509 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)