United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

356 F. Supp. 177, 6 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 850, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14909, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8724
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 1973
DocketNo. 68-239-Civ-J-S
StatusPublished

This text of 356 F. Supp. 177 (United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 356 F. Supp. 177, 6 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 850, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14909, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8724 (M.D. Fla. 1973).

Opinion

FINAL JUDGMENT

CHARLES R. SCOTT, District Judge.

This cause being before the Court on remand from a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (451 F.2d 418) affirming and reversing in part the decision of this Court (316 F.Supp. 567) and the Court of Appeals having found that the record supported a conclusion that the defendants had engaged in racially discrimina[179]*179tory employment practices prior to the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, the effects of which have been perpetuated since the effective date of the Act, resulting in a denial of equal employment opportunities for black employees of the Jacksonville Terminal Company (hereinafter the Terminal), and having ordered this Court to enter a decree in conformity with the opinion of the majority of the Court of Appeals, and this final judgment being in conformity therewith, now, therefore, it is hereby

Ordered and adjudged:

That the defendants: Jacksonville Terminal Company (hereinafter the Terminal) ; United Transportation Union (including the former Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen); Railroad Yardmasters of America; Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Stations Employes (including the Transportation-Communication Employes Union, now affiliated with the Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes); Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers; Brotherhood at Maintenance of Way Employes; American Railway Supervisors Association; Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen of America; International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; Brotherhood of Railway Carmen of America; International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers, and Helpers; Sheetmetal Workers International Association; International Brotherhood of Firemen, Oilers, Helpers, Roundhouse and Railway Shop Laborers; and System Federation No. 50 of the Railway Employes’ Department, AFL-CIO, their officers, agents, employees, servants and all other persons and organizations in active concert or participation with them are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from engaging in any employment practice which discriminates against blacks on account of their race or which perpetuates the unlawful effects of any past discrimination, and, in particular, it is Ordered: ’

That

I.

The provisions of this final judgment relating to seniority rights and transfer and promotion are based upon the facts of this case, and shall be applied only to the Terminal, and not to any other railroad; for the opinion of the Court of Appeals expressly provides:

[i]t should be self-evident that our decision with respect to seniority rights and transfer and promotion restrictions applies only to their use at this single facility, not to the whole railroad world.

United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 451 F.2d 418, 455 (5th Cir. 1971).

II.

(A) The phrase “Affected Group” as used hereinafter shall mean all black employees of the defendant Terminal who were hired prior to July 2, 1965, who as of the date of entry of this final judgment had an employment relationship with Terminal, and who did not occupy on the date of the entry of this final judgment jobs in crafts or classes wherein most of the jobs on that date were held by white Terminal employees and, for the purposes of transfers from Group 3 jobs to Group 1 jobs in the Terminal Baggage and Mail Department, all black employees of the Terminal who were hired into Group 3 jobs in that department subsequent to July 2, 1965, and during the time the Terminal had in effect its Personnel Test in that department.

(B) The term “vacancy” as used hereinafter shall mean all job openings in positions subject to a collective bargaining agreement which are open to bids. The term “vacancy” shall not include job openings caused by rescheduling or “reshuffling” of jobs or rear[180]*180rangement of the work forces within a certain craft or class which do not involve putting additional men to work. The existence of furloughed employees on the seniority roster where a job opening occurs shall not preclude a job opening from being treated as a vacancy. However, where there is a furloughed employee on the seniority roster when the opening occurs who shall have been on furlough for ninety (90) days or less, the opening shall not be treated as a vacancy under this paragraph, but may be treated as an opening caused by rescheduling or “reshuffling” of jobs or rearrangement of the work forces.

(C) The term “terminal seniority” as used herein shall mean the earliest seniority date held by a Terminal employee on any of the Terminal’s seniority rosters in effect on the effective date of this final judgment.

III.

(A) Before filling any vacancy as defined in paragraph 11(B) above in a craft or class which was occupied generally by whites as of July 2, 1965, the Terminal shall follow the procedures hereinafter set forth and award the vacancy in accordance with the terms of this final judgment, unless no member of the Affected Group bids for the position after the posting of notices as required by paragraphs III(B) and III(C) below.

(B) The Terminal shall continue to post notices of all vacancies, as the term “vacancy” is defined in 11(B) hereof, on all bulletin boards and in all bulletin books maintained for employees: all other vacancies shall be bulletined in accordance with the terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreements.

(C) Each notice of a vacancy shall set forth a brief description of the job, its rate of pay, the minimum requirements for the job, including any qualification requirements contained in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, and a statement of the nature and extent of the training, if any, which will be provided to the successful bidder. In addition, notices of vacancies occurring in the following jobs listed in Col. I shall state that railroad experience in the indicated jobs, Col. II, or equivalent experience obtained elsewhere, will be deemed necessary and relevant (formal training or technical education may be considered as a substitute for experience) :

(D) Vacancies in all jobs described in paragraph III (A) above shall be filled in the following manner:

1. All members of the Affected Group shall be entitled to bid on any vacaney outside their craft or class, using [181]*181their terminal seniority for bidding purposes; until they successfully bid for and retain, after any on-the-job probationary or training period (if required), a position outside the craft or class which they occupy on the date of entry of this final judgment. A member of the Affected Group shall use his terminal seniority only once to gain and retain a position in another craft or class. Once within another of such craft or class, when applicable collective bargaining agreements or Terminal policy permit the use of craft or class seniority to bid for vacant jobs outside the craft or class, members of the Affected Group shall utilize terminal seniority in lieu of such craft or class seniority.

2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
451 F.2d 418 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 F. Supp. 177, 6 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 850, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14909, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jacksonville-terminal-co-flmd-1973.