United States v. Jackson-Plascencia
This text of 414 F. App'x 954 (United States v. Jackson-Plascencia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Carlos Edmundo Jackson-Plascencia appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jackson-Plascencia contends that the district court erred by applying the wrong legal standards when evaluating whether he should receive a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). The record reflects that the district court applied the correct legal standard in denying the adjustment and did not clearly err by determining that Jackson-Plascencia did not meet his burden of showing that he was substantially less culpable than his co-participants. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-84 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 F. App'x 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-plascencia-ca9-2011.