United States v. Jackson-Plascencia

414 F. App'x 954
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 2011
Docket10-50030
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 414 F. App'x 954 (United States v. Jackson-Plascencia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jackson-Plascencia, 414 F. App'x 954 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Carlos Edmundo Jackson-Plascencia appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jackson-Plascencia contends that the district court erred by applying the wrong legal standards when evaluating whether he should receive a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). The record reflects that the district court applied the correct legal standard in denying the adjustment and did not clearly err by determining that Jackson-Plascencia did not meet his burden of showing that he was substantially less culpable than his co-participants. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-84 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson-Plascencia v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 308 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 F. App'x 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-plascencia-ca9-2011.