United States v. Jackson Holmes

900 F.2d 1322
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 1990
Docket89-1033WM
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 900 F.2d 1322 (United States v. Jackson Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jackson Holmes, 900 F.2d 1322 (8th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

Order On Rehearing

This matter comes before the court of rehearing en banc on a petition of the government. The panel’s opinion, which dealt with appellant’s rights under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, has been vacated.

Holmes’ sentence expired in June 1989. The government stated at oral argument that on completion of Holmes’ sentence, it filed a certificate under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 seeking a district court hearing to determine whether Holmes continues to suffer from a mental disease or defect which would create a substantial risk of bodily injury or property damage to another if Holmes were released. The section 4246 hearing has been deferred several times at Holmes’ request. The government stated that it has acceded to Holmes’ wishes to delay the hearing because Holmes presently is taking an antipsychotic medication voluntarily. Additionally, the government chose to defer the section 4246 hearing because of the pendency of this rehearing and its anticipation of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Washington v. Harper, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1028, 108 L.Ed.2d 178 (1990).

The government now asserts that this matter is moot. Holmes’ appeal sought a determination of his right to refuse anti-psychotic medications while being held under 18 U.S.C. § 4245. Because Holmes has completed his sentence and is no longer being held pursuant to that section, we agree that the matter is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Holmes’ appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Porter
D. Minnesota, 2025
Dalen v. Harpstead
D. Minnesota, 2024
United States v. Woods
970 F. Supp. 711 (D. Minnesota, 1997)
United States v. McAllister
969 F. Supp. 1200 (D. Minnesota, 1997)
United States v. Horne
955 F. Supp. 1141 (D. Minnesota, 1997)
United States v. Larry M. Phillips
989 F.2d 496 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Jeffrey Allen Steil
916 F.2d 485 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. McCarty
747 F. Supp. 311 (E.D. North Carolina, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
900 F.2d 1322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-holmes-ca8-1990.