United States v. Jackson
This text of 26 F. Cas. 555 (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(nem. con.) decided, that Major Barry was a competent witness, and his deposition was read.
Mr. Key then offered Messrs. Polkinhorn and Campbell.
Mr. Brent objected.
But the Coukt overruled the objection and they were examined.
The indictment charged the forgery to be to the prejudice of the right of the said W. T. Barry, and with intent to defraud him, under the eleventh section of the Penitentiary Act of 1831.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. Cas. 555, 4 D.C. 577, 4 Cranch 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-circtddc-1835.