United States v. Jackson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: January 27, 2026
• Docket: 25-10881
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-10881 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-10881 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ January 27, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Cedric Cornell Jackson,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-524-1 ______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Cedric Cornell Jackson appeals his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) conviction, asserting that the statute of his conviction is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment pursuant to New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). The Government has filed an unopposed motion

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-10881 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/27/2026

No. 25-10881

for summary affirmance, or alternatively, for an extension of time in which to file a brief. The Government is correct that Jackson’s facial constitutional challenge is foreclosed. See United States v. Diaz, 116 F.4th 458, 471-72 (5th Cir. 2024), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2822 (2025). Therefore, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED as moot, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.