United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 F.4th 261
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2021·No. 20-40046·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 20-40046 Document: 00515959690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/30/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED July 30, 2021 No. 20-40046 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Percy Jackson,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:19-CR-374-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Percy Jackson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jackson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-40046 Document: 00515959690 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/30/2021

No. 20-40046

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (5th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)