United States v. Jackson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 2007
Docket05-20660
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jackson, (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-20660 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JONATHAN ELLIOT JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-120-6 --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Jonathan Elliot Jackson has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jackson has filed a

response and moves for the appointment of new counsel. Our

independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jackson’s

response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2. The motion for appointment of new counsel is

DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca5-2007.