United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 F. App'x 54
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2008·No. 08-4197·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4197

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW ISAAC JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cr-00195-NCT-1)

Submitted: July 16, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Matthew Isaac Jackson seeks to appeal his conviction and

sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of

appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App.

P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of

excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an

extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.

App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th

Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on January 16, 2008.

Jackson filed the notice of appeal on February 1, 2008, after the

ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect

period. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the

excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court

for the court to determine whether Jackson has shown excusable

neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal

period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this

court for further consideration.

REMANDED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)