United States v. Jackman
This text of 21 C.M.A. 666 (United States v. Jackman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On consideration of the “Request for Extension of Time to Consider Certification” in the above-entitled case, and construed by the Court as a Motion for Leave to File a Certificate for Review, it appearing that said Certificate was received subsequent to the expiration of the thirty-day period established by Rule 25 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure and no adequate explanation of said delay has been advanced to justify a waiver of said Rule 25, it is, by the Court, this 8th day of December 1971,
ORDERED:
That said motion be, and the same is, hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 C.M.A. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackman-cma-1971.