United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau

442 F.2d 362, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10259

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 1971

Docket26007_1

StatusPublished

This text of 442 F.2d 362 (United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jack Daniel Nadeau, 442 F.2d 362, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10259 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. -, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15 (9th Cir. 1970).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. -, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).

His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15 (9th Cir. 1970).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 F.2d 362, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jack-daniel-nadeau-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack