United States v. Jack Damian Welp
This text of 469 F.2d 688 (United States v. Jack Damian Welp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A search incident to an arrest for robbery of the Citizens Valley Bank, Shedd, Oregon, revealed $369.00 cash on Welp’s immediate person. Welp was subsequently tried and convicted of that bank robbery, and we affirmed. United States v. Welp, 446 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1971).
The money in question was turned over to the said bank. Appellant filed a petition with the District Court seeking the return of the money to him. After a hearing, the District Court dismissed appellant’s petition, having found that the $369.00 was a product of the bank rob-ery, and belonged to the bank. Welp appeals from this determination.
Questions of fact determined by the trial judge must be upheld on review unless “clearly erroneous.” Campbell v. United States, 373 U.S. 487, 493, 83 S.Ct. 1356, 10 L.Ed.2d 501 (1963); United States v. Page, 302 F.2d 81, 85 (9th Cir. 1962). A “definite and firm conviction” that a mistake was committed below is a prerequisite to appellate reversal. United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1940).
Applying these standards we hold that under the facts of this case the judgment must be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 F.2d 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jack-damian-welp-ca9-1972.