United States v. Jack
This text of 231 F. App'x 483 (United States v. Jack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and joint appendix, the court affirms the judgment of the district court as the record fails to demonstrate unreasonableness in Willie Jack’s sentence. We note the district court’s: sufficient review of the § 3553(a) factors relevant to a revocation of supervised release pursuant to § 3583(e); correct application of the Guidelines (Jack’s misunderstanding of U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 Application Notes, n. 3 notwithstanding); and the absence of improper judicial fact-finding, as confirmed by Jack’s revocation-hearing admission to violating certain conditions of supervised release.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 F. App'x 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jack-ca6-2007.