United States v. Jack Braton Tomlin

454 F.2d 176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 1972
Docket71-1417
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 454 F.2d 176 (United States v. Jack Braton Tomlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jack Braton Tomlin, 454 F.2d 176 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In a seven-count indictment, Tomlin was charged with offenses proscribed by the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841(a) and 5861(d). He pleaded guilty to one of the counts and now appeals from the judgment of conviction. His contention is that the pertinent provisions of the Act are unconstitutional, infringing upon his alleged right to bear arms under the Second Amendment and upon powers reserved to the States under the Tenth Amendment.

The two arguments made by Tomlin are undermined by controlling precedent. See, e. g., United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971); United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 59 S.Ct. 816, 83 L.Ed. 1206 (1939); Sonzinsky v. United States, 300 U.S. 506, 57 S.Ct. 554, 81 L.Ed. 772 (1936).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 F.2d 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jack-braton-tomlin-ca9-1972.