United States v. J. M. Roark

257 F.2d 810, 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 839, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5630
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 1958
Docket15994_1
StatusPublished

This text of 257 F.2d 810 (United States v. J. M. Roark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. J. M. Roark, 257 F.2d 810, 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 839, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5630 (8th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

257 F.2d 810

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
J. M. ROARK et al.

No. 15994.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 3, 1958.

Edward L. Scheufler, U.S. Atty., and Horace Warren Kimbrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

C. E. Ruyle, Slankard, Ruyle & Henry, Neosho, Mo., William H. Curtis, Morrison, Hecker, Buck, Cozad & Rogers, Joseph R. Stewart and Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., and Lathrop, Righter, Blackwell, Gordon & Parker, Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed as premature, without prejudice, and cause remanded to District Court, on motion of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 F.2d 810, 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 839, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-j-m-roark-ca8-1958.