United States v. J. M. Roark
This text of 257 F.2d 810 (United States v. J. M. Roark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
257 F.2d 810
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
J. M. ROARK et al.
No. 15994.
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.
June 3, 1958.
Edward L. Scheufler, U.S. Atty., and Horace Warren Kimbrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.
C. E. Ruyle, Slankard, Ruyle & Henry, Neosho, Mo., William H. Curtis, Morrison, Hecker, Buck, Cozad & Rogers, Joseph R. Stewart and Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., and Lathrop, Righter, Blackwell, Gordon & Parker, Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from District Court dismissed as premature, without prejudice, and cause remanded to District Court, on motion of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 F.2d 810, 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 839, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-j-m-roark-ca8-1958.