United States v. J. Garcia-Jasso
This text of 608 F. App'x 295 (United States v. J. Garcia-Jasso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J. Consepcion Garcia-Jasso appeals his sentence for illegal reentry. He contends that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level drug trafficking enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 for his 1991 Texas offense of aggravated delivery of a controlled substance. He argues that the offense did not warrant the enhancement because the term “drug trafficking offense” in § 2L1.2 requires remuneration, which is not an element under Texas Health and Safety Code § 481.112(a) and (c) (1991). De novo review applies to his preserved objection. See United States v. Reyes-Mendoza, 665 F.3d 165, 166 (5th Cir.2011).
We recently rejected the argument that an offense must require remuneration to qualify as a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 201-05 (5th Cir.2015). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 F. App'x 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-j-garcia-jasso-ca5-2015.