United States v. J. D. Mullins, Jr., and Emily J. Mullins

344 F.2d 128, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5900
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 14, 1965·No. 9822·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Summary judgment was entered in this case upon a state of facts assumed to be uncontroverted. It appears, however, that the pleadings and the record do not contain the documents which might possibly supply a basis for the assumption, nor was any testimony taken and there is no agreement between the parties upon the facts so assumed. In the circumstances we think the case should be remanded for a full inquiry. Summary judgment was inappropriate. Rule 56(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.

The judgment will be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. J. D. Mullins, Jr., and Emily J. Mullins, 344 F.2d 128, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5900 (4th Cir. 1965).

344 F.2d 128 (United States v. J. D. Mullins, Jr., and Emily J. Mullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bostick Oil Co. v. Michelin Tire Corp.
478 F. Supp. 68 (D. South Carolina, 1979)
Benjamin Polycarpo Soley v. The Star & Herald Co.
390 F.2d 364 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)