United States v. Ivan Valdespino

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 2, 2019·No. 18-11395·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-11395 Document: 00515019600 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/02/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 18-11395 FILED Conference Calendar July 2, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IVAN VALDESPINO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-113-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ivan Valdespino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Valdespino has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-11395 Document: 00515019600 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/02/2019

No. 18-11395

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ivan Valdespino, (5th Cir. 2019).

United States v. Ivan Valdespino (United States v. Ivan Valdespino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)