United States v. Ismael Martinez-Hernandez

421 F. App'x 731
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
Docket09-10305
StatusUnpublished

This text of 421 F. App'x 731 (United States v. Ismael Martinez-Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ismael Martinez-Hernandez, 421 F. App'x 731 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ismael Martinez-Hernandez appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Citing United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez, 161 F.3d 556 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc), Martinez-Hernandez contends that the district court erred when it failed to grant a two-level downward departure based on a pre-indictment delay. He also contends that his low-end Guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable. The record reflects that the district court considered the Sanchez-Rodriguez arguments, properly understood the scope of its direction in imposing the sentence, and did not otherwise procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Martinez-Hernandez also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The record reflects that, under the totality of the circumstances, the sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also Carty, 520 F.3d at 993.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Miguel Sanchez-Rodriguez
161 F.3d 556 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Carty
520 F.3d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 F. App'x 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ismael-martinez-hernandez-ca9-2011.