United States v. Island
This text of 301 F. App'x 683 (United States v. Island) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Gregory Island appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Island contends that the district court erred by declining to apply the exclusionary rule at his supervised release revocation proceeding. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Hebert, 201 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam); see also United States v. DiazRosas, 13 F.3d 1305, 1307 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 F. App'x 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-island-ca9-2008.