United States v. Isham
This text of United States v. Isham (United States v. Isham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2005 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 04-8107 v. (D.C. No. 04-MJ-14-ABJ) DAVID K. ISHAM, (D. Wyo.) Defendant - Appellant.
ORDER
Before HENRY, McKAY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.
During oral argument, with exceptional and commendable candor, counsel
for the government conceded that the evidence in this case is insufficient to
support Defendant’s conviction of being in actual physical control of a motor
vehicle while under the influence of alcohol pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1)
and moved to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss the
charge. *
We GRANT the government’s motion and REMAND this case to the
district court with directions to dismiss the charge for violation of 36 C.F.R.
* Defendant did not appeal his conviction for firearms, and it, therefore, stands. § 4.23 (a)(1).
Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Isham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-isham-ca10-2005.