United States v. Iselin

87 F. 194, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1786
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 11, 1898·No. Nos. 2638, 2640·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

TOWNSEND, District Judge

(orally). These cases raise the question whether the tariff act of July 24, 1897, commonly known as the “Dingley Act,” became effective at the precise time in the day on which it was signed by the president or at the beginning of sai,d day. The various questions involved have been exhaustively pre[201]*201seated in tlie arguments and briefs of counsel, and have been carefully considered and examined. The opinion of tlie board of general appraisers reversing the action of the collector contains a full' statement of the facts and an admirable discussion of the questions of law, and the decision of said board is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Iselin, 87 F. 194, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1786 (circtsdny 1898).

87 F. 194 (United States v. Iselin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bristol Mfg. Corp. v. United States
2 F. Supp. 781 (Court of Claims, 1933)
J. B. Ellison & Sons v. United States
142 F. 732 (Third Circuit, 1906)
John B. Ellison & Sons v. United States
136 F. 969 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1905)
United States v. Stoddard, Haserick, Richards & Co.
89 F. 699 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1898)