United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon
This text of 141 F.3d 1468 (United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
141 F.3d 1468
11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1479
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Isabel RODRIGUEZ DE VARON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-5421.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 29, 1998.
Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Defender, Faith Mesnekoff, Asst. Fed. Pub. Defender, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
William A. Keefer, U.S. Atty., Dawn Bowen, Anne Ruth Schultz, Phillip DiRosa, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 96-576-CR-KMM), K. Michael Moore, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion March 3, 1998, 11th Cir., 136 F.3d 740)
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Senior Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 F.3d 1468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-isabel-rodriguez-de-varon-ca11-1998.