United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon

141 F.3d 1468
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 29, 1998·No. 96-5421·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

141 F.3d 1468

11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1479

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Isabel RODRIGUEZ DE VARON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-5421.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

May 29, 1998.

Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Defender, Faith Mesnekoff, Asst. Fed. Pub. Defender, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

William A. Keefer, U.S. Atty., Dawn Bowen, Anne Ruth Schultz, Phillip DiRosa, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 96-576-CR-KMM), K. Michael Moore, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 3, 1998, 11th Cir., 136 F.3d 740)

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

*

Senior Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon, 141 F.3d 1468 (11th Cir. 1998).

141 F.3d 1468 (United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon
175 F.3d 930 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
United States v. De Varon
136 F.3d 740 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)