United States v. Irvine

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Irvine

693 F. App'x 847

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 12, 2017·No. No. 16-17037 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

L. Dale Jones, appointed counsel for Lena Kenya Irvine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cur independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion [848] to withdraw is GRANTED and Irvine’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

L. Dale Jones, appointed counsel for Lena Kenya Irvine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cur independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion [848] to withdraw is GRANTED and Irvine’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Irvine, 693 F. App'x 847 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

693 F. App'x 847 (United States v. Irvine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related