United States v. Irizarry
71 M.J. 444, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 1144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Irizarry. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 M.J. 100 →
Opinion
CCA 37748. On consideration of the motions filed by Robert D. Gifford II, Esq., it is ordered that said motions are [445]*445hereby granted to the extent that Ms. Gauri Nautiyal may appear as a law student under the supervision of Mr. Gifford on behalf of Amicus Curiae, The University of Oklahoma College of Law, in support of Appellee, that she may file an Amicus brief in support of Appellee, and that she is allotted 10 minutes to present oral argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Irizarry, 71 M.J. 444, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 1144 (Ark. 2012).
71 M.J. 444 (United States v. Irizarry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.