United States v. Ira Gibson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 2018
Docket17-10045
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ira Gibson (United States v. Ira Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ira Gibson, (9th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10045

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00217-JD-1

v. MEMORANDUM* IRA DWAYNE GIBSON, AKA James Long,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2018** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and MUELLER,*** District Judge.

Appellant Ira Dwayne Gibson appeals a suspicionless search condition

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation. imposed as part of his supervised release sentence. Gibson’s appeal was fully

briefed on October 30, 2017. The court set oral argument for March 16, 2018, but

vacated oral argument upon Gibson’s emergency motion to continue the hearing in

light of his counsel’s illness. On March 30, 2018, the court ordered the parties to

address whether this appeal is moot.

The government represents that Gibson completed his term of supervised

release on April 22, 2018. Gibson does not dispute this representation, nor does he

demonstrate any exception to the mootness doctrine applies here. This appeal

became moot on April 22, 2018 when Gibson completed his sentence. See United

States v. King, No. 17-10006, slip op. at 1-6, __ F.3d __, 2018 WL 2473489 (9th

Cir. June 4, 2018); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

The appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Joseph M. Palomba
182 F.3d 1121 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ira Gibson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ira-gibson-ca9-2018.