United States v. Intersimone

Second Circuit

United States v. Intersimone

222 F.2d 888

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 1955

DocketNo. 258, Docket 23506

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 F.2d 888 (United States v. Intersimone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Intersimone, 222 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our review of this case convinces us that there was sufficient credible and admissible evidence to warrant the jury’s finding that there had been -one over-all conspiracy, see Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 68 S.Ct. 248, 92 L.Ed. 154, and that each of these defendants had participated in it. See United States v. McKee, 2 Cir., 220 F.2d 266. There was no reversible error either in the admission of evidence or in the vigorous prosecution of the case by the Assistant United States Attorney in charge. The conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Our review of this case convinces us that there was sufficient credible and admissible evidence to warrant the jury’s finding that there had been -one over-all conspiracy, see Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 68 S.Ct. 248, 92 L.Ed. 154, and that each of these defendants had participated in it. See United States v. McKee, 2 Cir., 220 F.2d 266. There was no reversible error either in the admission of evidence or in the vigorous prosecution of the case by the Assistant United States Attorney in charge. The conviction is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 F.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-intersimone-ca2-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack