United States v. International Reinsurance Corp.

189 S.E. 237, 183 Ga. 614, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 158
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 1, 1936
DocketNo. 11367
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 S.E. 237 (United States v. International Reinsurance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. International Reinsurance Corp., 189 S.E. 237, 183 Ga. 614, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 158 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

The court did not err in rendering the judgment excepted to. The right of the plaintiff in error to maintain its claim and recover thereon depended upon the question whether the contract between Public Indemnity Company and International Reinsurance Corporation was valid, or was invalid on the ground of fraud. Although the parties to this case are very numerous, and the record is very long, and the documents numerous and lengthy, there is nothing in the record to show that the contract referred to was invalid for the reasons alleged. The court properly rendered the decree excepted to.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hatcher
196 S.E. 773 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Withers v. Hatcher
195 S.E. 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 S.E. 237, 183 Ga. 614, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-international-reinsurance-corp-ga-1936.