United States v. International Forwarding Co.

9 Ct. Cust. 156, 1919 WL 21368, 1919 CCPA LEXIS 31
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided April 15, 1919·No. No. 1958·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

De Vries, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal concerns the dutiable classification of certain polari-scopes and polariscope tubes imported at the port of Chicago. They were rated for duty by the collector at that port as optical instruments and mountings for the same under the provisions of paragraph 93 of the tariff act of 1913, reading as follows:

93. Opera and field glasses, optical instruments and frames and mountings for the same; all the foregoing not specially provided for in this section, 35 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested, claiming the articles properly dutiable as manufactures in chief value of metal under the provisions of paragraph 167 of said act. The Board of General Appraisers sustained the protest. The Government appeals.

[157] The initial question presented for answer is, Whether or not a polari-scope is an optical instrument? This court in United States v. Bliss & Co. et al. (6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 433; T. D. 35980), gave consideration to the meaning of the words “optical instruments” in paragraph 93, supra. The implements there before the court, and which were held not optical instruments, were azimuth mirrors, sextants, and octants, maritime implements used for ascertaining distances between objects. The court pertinently said:

We think in the determination of the question at bar some inquiry should be made as to the purpose as well as the use of these imported articles. They are not designed for experimentation or investigation in the vast field of the phenomena of light. They contain appliances, glass prisms principally, that, taking advantage of known properties of light rays, reflect or refract them upon a prepared surface or plate for the sole purpose of measuring certain angles, the measurement of which, being correctly determined, enables a navigator to correct the error of the magnetic needle and determine the accurate location of his vessel at sea. They do not of themselves, nor are they designed to, directly or indirectly aid vision. Their function is not to produce for optical inspection a picture of the sun or any heavenly or other object, thereby in any sense assisting or increasing the sense of sight, but rather they present to the vision a desired mathematical conclusion which is expressed upon an instrument in degrees by means of light. They apply principles or laws discovered and established by prior investigation in the science of optics for the purpose of producing a result not optical but mathematical, viz, the measurement of an angle.
The fact that light is the foundation of vision is doubtless the reason why the science of optics is said to relate not only to the organs of vision but to light itself, and doubtless accounts for what we think is the fact, that in the common understanding of the term “optical” relates to the phenomena of both light and vision. They are inseparable, because light itself is the sensation of which one becomes conscious through the optic nerve.

The uses and functions of the polariscope may best be described by quotation from the standard authorities of the definitions thereof. The following are pertinent:

New Standard Dictionary (1916):

Polariscope. — * * 2. An optical instrument for exhibiting or measuring the polarization of light, or for examining substances in polarized light. [Italics ours.]
Optical instrument. — Any instrument designed to act upon light, especially one involving reflection, refraction, or polarization. [Italics ours.]

Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia (.1911):

Polariscope. — An optical instrument, various forms of which have been contrived, or exhibiting the polarization of light, or for examining substances in polarized light. [Italics ours.]
Optical. — 1. Relating to or connected with the science of optics; based on or constructed in accordance -with the laws of optics: As, optical laws; optical instruments. [Italics ours.]

Webster’s New International Dictionary (1916): •

Polariscope. — An instrument for studying the properties of, or examining substances in, polarized light. [Italics ours.]
Optical. — 1. Relating to the science of optics; as, an optical instrument. [Italics ours.]
[158] Optics. — That branch of physical science which treats of the nature and properties of light, the laws of its modification by opaque and transparent bodies, and the phenomena of vision. [Italics ours.]

Oxford Dictionary (1909):

Polariscope. — An instrument for showing the polarization of light, or mewing objects in polarized light; * * *. [Italics ours.]

Knight's Mechanical Dictionary (pp. 1759-60) describes the polariscope as—

An instrument for observing the phenomena exhibited by polarized rays of light proceeding from a luminous object, as the sun. [Italics ours.]

Dictionary of Scientific Terms, Nuttall:

. Polariscope. — (Gr. polos, a pole, and skopeo, to view), an apparatus or instrument for exhibiting the polarization of light. [Italics ours.]

The Standard Thesaurus, Mawson:

Under section 445 — optical instruments — names the polariscope. [Italics ours.]

These definitions as to the practical uses of the polariscope and the method of its employment while in use accord with the testimony in the record.

The implements the subject of decision in United States v. Bliss & Co. et al., supra, concisely stated, were held not to be optical instruments, first, in that they did not of themselves nor were they designed to directly or indirectly aid vision; and, secondly, that their function was not to produce for optical inspection the picture of any object, or in any sense assist or increase the sense of sight, but rather to present to the vision a mathematical conclusion expressed in degrees by means of light.

The polariscope, upon the other hand, according to all of the definitions aforesaid, is used to enable the observer to view the phenomena of polarized light and particularly to examine objects under polarized light. There is the dual purpose of the exhibition of the polarized light and of examining substances under polarized light. It is the effected condition of the light itself and of objects thereunder, accomplished by the polariscope, which are the subjects of the observation through means of the polariscope, rather than the bare record of the result of the refraction of rays, as in the case of the instruments the subject of decision in the Bliss & Co. et al. case. It would therefore seem that the polariscope is within the terms of said decision, as well as the accepted authority, an optical instrument.

There is next presented for decision the question whether or not polariscope tubes are mountings for optical instruments within the provisions of said paragraph 93.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. International Forwarding Co., 9 Ct. Cust. 156, 1919 WL 21368, 1919 CCPA LEXIS 31 (ccpa 1919).

9 Ct. Cust. 156 (United States v. International Forwarding Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wild Heerbrugg Instruments, Inc. v. United States
81 Cust. Ct. 66 (U.S. Customs Court, 1978)
Olympus Corp. of America v. United States
72 Cust. Ct. 176 (U.S. Customs Court, 1974)
Decca Radar, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 165 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)
F. W. Myers & Co. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 420 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)
Willoughbys Camera Stores, Inc. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 76 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)
United States v. Massce
20 C.C.P.A. 210 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1932)
United States v. Bell & Howell Co.
19 C.C.P.A. 151 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1931)
American Holding Corp. v. United States
18 C.C.P.A. 275 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1930)
Thomas Co. v. United States
12 Ct. Cust. 425 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)