United States v. Imbert
This text of 26 F. Cas. 465 (United States v. Imbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objection taken on the ground of defect of evidence is insurmountable. Manslaughter is no offence against the laws of the United States, unless it be committed on the high seas, or in some place under the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or on board of a vessel belonging to a citizen or citizens of the United States, on some water within a foreign jurisdiction, by one or more of the ship’s company, or a passenger, upon some other passenger or member of the ship’s company. It is therefore essential for the prosecutor to prove that the vessel belonged to a citizen or citizens of the United States, if the offence be committed within a foreign jurisdiction. Whether the registry be or be not the only legal evidence to prove the fact, need not be decided in this case; since there has been no evidence of any kind given to establish the fact. This being the case, the jury ougnt to acquit the defendant.
Verdict, not guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. Cas. 465, 4 Wash. C. C. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-imbert-circtedpa-1827.