United States v. Ignacio Rodriguez-Cepeda

714 F. App'x 442
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2018
Docket16-41243 Summary Calendar
StatusUnpublished

This text of 714 F. App'x 442 (United States v. Ignacio Rodriguez-Cepeda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ignacio Rodriguez-Cepeda, 714 F. App'x 442 (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM: *

Ignacio Rodriguez-Cepeda appealed his sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. He contended that the district court erred in increasing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his Texas convictions of burglary of a habitation under Texas Penal Code § 30.02. We granted the government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance, agreeing that Rodriguez-Cepeda’s arguments were foreclosed by United States v. Uribe, 838 F.3d 667 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 137 S.Ct. 1359, 197 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017).

In United States v. Herrold, 883 F.3d 517 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc), this court overruled Uribe. This panel requested letter briefs for the parties to state what action should be taken in light of Herrold. Both sides agree that the sentence cannot stand. The government carefully maintains its disagreement with Herrold for purposes of pre-serving the issue for further appellate review.

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion, United States v. Rodriguez-Cepeda, 691 F. App’x 181 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam), is WITHDRAWN, and the judgment of sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing. The mandate shall issue immediately.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Felix Uribe
838 F.3d 667 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Michael Herrold
883 F.3d 517 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Rodriguez-Cepeda
691 F. App'x 181 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 F. App'x 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ignacio-rodriguez-cepeda-ca5-2018.